44% Of Female Doctors Work Part-Time. Are They Betraying Their Profession?

The new trend in medicine isn’t some experimental drug or elaborate surgery: It’s doctors who work part-time. A new survey finds that twice as many female doctors as male doctors work less than full-time: 44% of women, compared to 22% of men. And both numbers have risen dramatically in recent years. Who’s driving the change? Old men and young women. Are they a drag on the system, as some argue, or are they leading the way to a more humane medical system?

As American Medical News reports, back in 2005 just 7% of men and 29% of women physicians worked less than-full time. Now, more and more doctors are seeing the benefits of not working insane hours. For those numbers to rise so quickly, something big must be happening. Experts say it’s two groups of the fastest-growing groups of doctors that are making it happen: Women at the beginning or middle of their careers, and men near the end of theirs. (The survey is from Cejka Search and the American Medical Group Association.)

The number of doctors overall has risen dramatically in the last 20 years. The average age of male doctors has been getting higher, while the average age of female doctors has been dropping. Women now make up about half of all medical school graduates. Both these groups — older men and younger women — have familiar reasons to want to work part-time: Women want to have time with their families, and men want to hold onto their careers past traditional retirement age, but still be able to relax and travel. “It’s the best thing I didn’t retire,” one older male doctor told the website. “I would have gone crazy.”

It sounds like great news for everyone: Doctors get to do their jobs in ways that work for them. They avoid burnout, and get to spend time with their families without dropping out of the workforce completely. This clearly makes medicine a more friendly field for young women.

But the trend toward part-time doctoring has its critics. Last year, anesthesiologist Karen Sibert argued in the New York Times that doctors have a responsibility to work full-time — essentially, that slacker women doctors were a drag on the system and a danger to their patients. In a genuinely thought-provoking op-ed, she wrote:

This may seem like a personal decision, but it has serious consequences for patients and the public.

Medical education is supported by federal and state tax money both at the university level — student tuition doesn’t come close to covering the schools’ costs — and at the teaching hospitals where residents are trained. So if doctors aren’t making full use of their training, taxpayers are losing their investment. With a growing shortage of doctors in America, we can no longer afford to continue training doctors who don’t spend their careers in the full-time practice of medicine.

It isn’t fashionable (and certainly isn’t politically correct) to criticize “work-life balance” or part-time employment options. How can anyone deny people the right to change their minds about a career path and choose to spend more time with their families? I have great respect for stay-at-home parents, and I think it’s fine if journalists or chefs or lawyers choose to work part time or quit their jobs altogether. But it’s different for doctors. Someone needs to take care of the patients.

What do you think? Are women doctors betraying the public trust, not to mention their paychecks? Or are we moving toward a more evolved vision of the workplace, one in which working hard even in the most elevated professions is compatible with having a full family life, too?

Photo: Aletia / Shutterstock.com

Share This Post:
    • Linda Guild

      I think its interesting that it is the women new to the field and the men at retirement age who are working part-time. I am not well versed enough to weigh in on whether this is a burden to society based upon how medical school is subsidized. Personally I think that doctors who are avoiding burnout may help society. We might have fewer mistakes and accidents. I would love to know how other physicians view this trend. Could it be an incentive for those wanting to enter medical school but do not want to work 60-80 hours/week for the lives?

      Do others think that doctors should be different when it comes to part-time?

      Linda Guild

    • Pingback: Study: Female Doctors Paid Less Than Their Male Counterparts()

    • xyz

      What “experts” are you referencing? This article seems to be based largely on opinion. The report does present the ages of women or men electing part time work. It also does not address the percent of women or men who have children or want to spend more time with their children. Sensationalist garbage.

    • puapuapua

      Who wrote this piece of garbage? Since when does working 3 days a week versus 5 days a week or 6 hours a day versus 8-10 hours a day make you a danger to your patients. I’d much rather have a doctor who isn’t totally stressed out & mentally drained from over work.
      And here’s a thought– maybe if the male doctors took on a larger role at home with the kids & household, then maybe the women doctors would have more time to spend in practice.
      Why didn’t the writer just come out & say women should stay home barefoot & pregnant & in the kitchen….

    • Myra Esoteric

      As a feminist I think this is a step backwards (people taking a medical degree and then going part time or dropping out). And that we should delegate some more responsibilities to NPs and PAs, such as the ability to prescribe medicine.